The No-Cost Thirty Year Fixed Rate Mortgage
        There  really is no such thing as a "no-cost" mortgage loan. There are always  costs, such as appraisal fees, escrow fees, title insurance fees,  document fees, processing fees, flood certification fees, recording  fees, notary fees, tax service fees, wire fees, and so on, depending on  whether the loan is a purchase or a refinance. The term "no-cost"  actually means that your lender is paying the costs of the loan. All a  "no cost" loan means is that there is no cost to you, the borrower. 
            
          Except that you pay a higher interest rate. 
            
          Understand How Loans Are Priced 
            
          A variation of the no-cost loan is the "no points" loan, or even  the "no points, no lender fees" loan. On these loans you pay all the  costs associated with buying a house or refinancing, but you do not  have to pay the lender associated fees or points. However, since  lenders and loan officers do not do anything for free, the profit has  to come from somewhere. 
            
          So where does it come from? 
            
          First, you have to understand how loans are priced and how mortgage  lenders and loan officers earn income. Each morning mortgage companies  create rate sheets for loan officers. The rates usually change slightly  from day to day. In volatile markets they change several times a day.  On the rate sheet, there are many different programs, including the  thirty year fixed rate. 
            
          There will be one column which will lists several different  interest rates and another column that lists the "cost" for that  particular rate. For example: 
            
        
          
          Rate          Cost(points)  
          ======       =============  
          6.250%           2.000   
          6.375%           1.500  
          6.500%           1.000  
          6.625%           0.500  
          6.750%           0.000  
          6.875%          (0.500)   
          7.000%          (1.000)   
          7.125%          (1.500)  
          7.250%          (2.000)  
        
        
        
        In the above example, 6.75% has a "par" price, which means it has a  zero cost. The lower in rate you go, the higher the cost, or "points."  A point is equal to one percent of the loan amount. The parentheses in  the cost column for the higher interest rates indicates a negative  number. For example, (1.500) equals -1.500, which means instead of  having a cost associated with the loan, the lender is willing to pay  out money for those interest rates. This is called "premium" or  "rebate" pricing. 
        
        
-- Zero Cost Loans -- 
        
        How Mortgage Companies and Loan Officers Make Money 
        
        The above rate sheet is not a rate sheet designed for public  review. In fact, most lenders have a policy that the public cannot see  their internal rate sheet. This rate sheet is designed for loan  officers and the cost column is the loan officer's cost, not the cost  to the borrower. When the loan officer quotes you an interest rate, he  will add on a certain amount, usually one to one and a half points.  Most companies leave it up to the loan officer's discretion how much to  add on to the base cost. However, they usually require at least a  minimum add-on, which is usually one point. 
        
        The loan officer's commission depends on his "split" with the  company and can vary. He receives a portion of the add-on and the rest  goes to the company. 
        
        If we assume the loan officer is adding on one point, and you were  willing to pay one point for your loan, then your rate would be  (according to this rate sheet) 6.75%. You would pay one percentage  point and receive an interest rate of six and three-quarters. If you  wanted a lower rate and were willing to pay two points, you could get  six and a half percent. If you wanted a "no points" loan, then your  rate would be seven percent. The loan officer and the mortgage company  would split the one point rebate, listed as (1.000) on the rate sheet. 
        
        
See how it works? 
        
        In addition to the cost noted on the rate sheet above, lenders have  certain other fees they like to collect, too. These can include  document fees, processing fees, underwriting fees, warehouse fees,  flood certification fees, wire transfer fees, tax service fees, and so  on. Usually, you will not be charged all of these fees, it is just that  different lenders call them different things. Some of them are  legitimate costs to the lender and some of them are simply fees  designed to generate additional income to the mortgage company. They  are customary in today's mortgage market and can vary from around $600  to $1300. In addition, there will usually be an appraisal fee and a  credit report fee. Appraisals and credit reports are usually contracted  out to independent companies even though these are considered to be  lender fees. 
        
        Note that it is common for companies who charge higher fees to have  a slightly lower interest rate and companies that charge lower fees  will usually have a slightly higher interest rate. So if you shop  entirely based on fees, you may actually spend more money in the long  run because your interest rate may be higher. 
        
        The point is that if you want a "no points - no lender fees" loan,  then on our rate sheet above, you may get an interest rate of 7.125%.  That is because the loan officer has to bump the interest rate even  further than on a "no points" loan in order to cover his own company's  fees. 
        
        If you want a "no cost" loan, then the loan officer has to bump  your interest rate even further. That is because all of the costs on  your purchase or refinance do not come from the lender. The escrow or  settlement company involved in your transaction will charge a fee which  must be paid. The lender will require title insurance and the title  insurance company charges a fee for providing this insurance. If your  new lender requires information from your homeowner's association (if  you have one) then the homeowner's association will most likely charge  a fee for providing those documents. If you are refinancing, your  current lender will usually charge at least two fees: a "demand" fee,  and a "reconveyance" fee. The demand fee is charged simply for  providing payoff information. The reconveyance fee is charged because  your current lender prepares a document which releases your property as  collateral for their outstanding loan. This document is called a  reconveyance. 
        
        These charges will add about another point to how much the loan  officer must collect in premium pricing in order to cover the costs  associated with your refinance or purchase. For a zero cost loan, he  will normally need to collect somewhere in the neighborhood of two and  a half points. Because points are a percentage of your loan amount and  most of the costs are fixed, it takes fewer points to provide zero  costs on higher loan amounts. On smaller loan amounts it takes more.  One percent of $200,000 is two thousand dollars and one percent of  $100,000 is only $1000, so you can see how it is easier to cover costs  on larger loans. 
        
        
Does it makes sense to do a zero cost loan? 
        
        On a $200,000 thirty year fixed rate loan, the difference in  monthly mortgage payments will be about $87, using the example rate  sheet on the first page. Over thirty years, it works out that you will  pay more than $30,000 extra for getting a zero cost loan. So if you  intend to remain in the home for a long period of time it just doesn't  make sense. 
        
        Suppose you intend to stay for only five years? On a purchase,  using the $200,000 example, if you stayed longer than fifty-five  months, it would make more sense to pay your own costs and get the  lower interest rate. If you kept the loan for a shorter time, then it  makes more sense to pay zero costs and get a higher interest rate. 
        
        Except for one thing. 
        
        If you knew you were only going to be staying in the home for five  years you would probably not want a thirty year fixed rate, anyway. You  would get a loan which has a fixed payment for the first five years,  then convert to an adjustable or whatever fixed rates are five years  from now. These loans have an interest rate almost a half percent lower  than thirty year fixed rate loans. Since it is practically impossible  to do a zero cost loan on this type of loan, you would have to compare  a zero cost thirty year fixed rate loan to paying points on a loan with  a fixed payment for five years. 
        
        The difference in payments would be about $150. The two and a half  point rebate equals $5000. Working out the math, if you stayed in the  home longer than thirty-three months, it would make more sense to pay  the points and get the loan with the five year fixed rate. 
        
        Finally, carry the discussion one step further. Suppose you know  you are going to be in the new loan for less than three years? Doesn't  it make sense to get a "zero cost" loan then? 
        
        No. 
        
        Then you get an adjustable rate loan. As long as the start rate is  two percent lower than the current fixed rate, you cannot lose. The  first year you will save a lot of money. The second year you will  probably break even. The third year, you will probably give up some of  the savings from the first year, but not all of them. 
        
        "Zero cost" loans just don't make sense for Homebuyers. 
        But they sound really good in an advertisement. 
        
        
Exceptions: 
        
        
          
          - On a FHA Streamline Refinance Without an Appraisal (not a  purchase - which is what the article talks about), it makes sense to do  a zero cost loan. This is mostly because the new loan has to be exactly  the same amount as the existing balance of the current loan.
 
          - If  the Homebuyer only has enough money for down payment and none to cover  closing costs, PLUS no arrangement can be made for the seller to pay  closing costs, then zero costs may make sense (however, I would still  recommend negotiating terms with the homeseller - be willing to pay a  higher price in exchange for the seller paying your costs)